|
Who wouldn’t be suspicious? Right from the get-go this workshop is promising cure-all concoctions that bring new life to everything they touch. The potions work in ways that are difficult to explain and impossible to actually see. The man conducting the affair is fast-talking and charismatic—he even lives in a far-off land. The whole thing smells like snake oil.
Here’s the catch: Gil Carandang, this crafty man from the Philippines, is not trying to sell us anything. In fact, he wants us to buy as little as possible—that’s the point of this seminar. The lesson that’s officially on the agenda is the same as the event’s formal title: “Cultivating Beneficial Indigenous Microorganisms.” But what’s really being taught here, the true objective, is the empowerment of farmers.
By learning how to cultivate microorganisms, growers become able to meet their needs with what exists on the farm and can stop buying amendments from chemical companies (purveyors who, some might argue, are the real peddlers in modern farming). The technology was born of ingenuity, but it has spread by financial necessity, primarily among farmers in developing countries for whom agricultural chemicals are painfully expensive.
“This technology can reduce your costs by 30 to 50%,” Carandang says. “It sounds amazing, but that’s the percent most farmers spend on pesticides and fertilizer. On my farm, we have only two medicines: Lacto bacillus and ginger-garlic extract. We make both ourselves.”
Learning how to do that is what has drawn a sold-out crowd to this vegetable farm in Bolinas, California, for one of Carandang’s rare seminars in North America. (The class covered both cultivating microorganisms and making fermented plant extracts. Only the former is discussed here.)
No hifalutin nonsense, just affordable techniques that work
It’s a simple set-up, with chairs crammed into the barn and facing a makeshift stage in the packing area. At center stage stand two folding tables. On them lie the unexpected tools of this fantastic technology: A box of generic brown sugar and a bulb of garlic. A quart of milk, a cutting board, and some cooked white rice. A liter of the cheapest vodka in California, and a Miller High Life tall boy.
 |
RODALE INSTITUTE RESEARCH SPOTLIGHT
Ongoing research at The Rodale Institute® sheds light on one important component of the soil community--mycorrhizal fungi--and its impact on agricultural production. Under the leadership of Dr. David Douds, a soil microbiologist with the USDA's Agricultural Research Service, field trials have shown yield gains of as much as 50% in the presence of healthy mycorrhizae populations. Now Douds is developing a practical, low-cost method for on-farm production of mycorrhizal soil inoculant, promising higher yields with lower nutrient inputs.
For the latest on Douds’ researchclick here
For a mycorrhizae fact sheet, click here.
|
|
He sounds like a crackpot, but in fact Carandang has studied farming all over the world, including as a Fulbright scholar. (He now farms full-time back in the Philippines.) This odd display of un-magical ingredients is evidence not of a sham, but rather of his emphasis on making technology accessible. You see, discussions of beneficial microorganisms usually take one of two dangerous paths. People either get New Age-y with it and scare listeners off, or (for fear of being called New Age-y), they legitimize the concept using complicated scientific formulas—to much the same effect. Carandang takes the middle road.
“In the Philippines, I’m usually teaching people who have never been to school, and they get it fine,” he says. “We don’t need no high-falutin’ nonsense around here.”
With today’s distinctly educated, Western crowd, the message doesn’t sink in immediately. Everyone is scribbling madly to keep up with Carandang’s patter, careful to not miss a word of the lesson. But as we are figuring out how to spell “hifalutin”, he catches us off-guard. “What matters here is that you understand the very essence of this idea. So stop taking notes, just listen.”
We lift our heads, and I realize that Carandang has been talking for an hour now and hasn’t touched a thing on the table. With an American teacher we would have photocopies of a syllabus and already be on section 2b. Instead, our teacher is circling around the subject, peeling off the outer layers of meaning, waxing on about the macrocosmic workings of Nature.
We don’t know it now, but this conceptual approach is essential to the practice we came to learn. Understanding the idea itself works as a sort of inoculant; without it, the act of Cultivating Beneficial Indigenous Microorganisms is more or less useless.
“This is rather than just ‘Oh, let’s spray this, and put on this fertilizer every two weeks,” he says. “Instead, you just need to open your eyes and pay attention, slow down the process. The plant will talk back. Not literally, but it will always tell us what is wrong, what is deficient. How could you know what it needs if you haven’t paid attention?”
Growing soil, not plants: Building up the soil’s life and biodiversity
Behind Carandang and the makeshift stage is an old forest so dense and tangled you can hardly make out its individual members. It turns out it is the perfect backdrop. Promoting health and growth are the objectives of this technology, and the forest has both in spades—naturally. It’s because of its biodiversity.
We all know the biodiversity spiel: the more life a place supports, the more variation it has; that variation means competition, which regulates populations into healthy numbers. The more a place is allowed to be natural, the more it balances itself out.
Natural balance is not the goal of the farmer, his work being the cultivation of select members of the ecosystem. But again: single crops, tight geometry, and insects and weeds eliminated, altogether mean a sterile environment that can’t keep itself in check. But a farm with variegated fields and wild plants and insects that feed sparrows that feed hawks is one that begins to balance itself.
Now, few farmers import hawks to strengthen their farm ecosystems. You just can’t insert something that high up the food chain and expect it to survive. Instead, build the system that supports it, and the hawks will come on their own.
“It’s not all about NPK here,” Carandang says. “It’s not all about sun, air, et cetera, it’s all about all. It’s all about one, about a whole unit. The more you are able to understand this, the more you’ll be able to practice good farming.”
Rather than grow plants, Carandang advocates growing soil. Not multiplying dirt, but building up the soil’s life and diversity—that is the foundation of this system. And the building blocks are microorganisms, whose most essential work is to break down nutrients into forms that are accessible to plants and animals. Without them, the planet would be bare rock.
“There is a Chinese proverb that goes, ‘Add humility to intelligence, it becomes wisdom. Add passion or fire to wisdom, it becomes enlightenment,’” Carandang says. “In soil fertility, it’s the same basis, that’s my opinion. It’s the fire that makes the living soil, and the fire is the microorganisms.”
This is the part where most of the world shakes its head. No amount of microorganisms could be as effective as bringing in a load of compost or spraying fungicides. They are too small to be powerful, too unfamiliar to be essential.
And yet farmers rely on them all the time. That pink dye on legume seed, for instance, is there to tell you the seed will fix nitrogen because it has been doused with the necessary inoculant—itself a beneficial microorganism. Anyone who has ever watched a compost heap steam has seen the strength of beneficial microorganisms, and anyone who has ever taken acidophilus to recover from antibiotics has felt them at work.
Any farmer who has suffered Phytopthera or Verticillium is familiar with microorganisms, but not the good kind. Luckily, as Carandang explains, these pathogens comprise only three to five percent of all microbes. “If it were more,” he says, “we’d all be dead.”
Plants and humans are protected from pathogens by diversity—it leads to competition, which prevents any single microbe from going out of control. In the forest, this diversity comes naturally as different plants and animals attract and support different microorganisms. But if you have, say, just grapes and cover crops planted, you’re not encouraging diversity, in fact you’re discouraging it. That is why you introduce microbes.
Making microbes
But first you must have the microbes. And that, hours later, is why we are in the barn, rather cold after sitting here for so long, but patiently learning how to Cultivate Beneficial Indigenous Microorganisms.
The act itself, in all its variations, might take 15 minutes to demonstrate. It’s a basic formula: Set out carbohydrates to attract microbes from a place—its air, its soil, its plants and animals. Feed the microbes sugar so they’ll multiply (or in the case of Lacto bacilli, feed them milk to encourage a specific population). Dilute the potion and apply it to whatever needs help.
If sheer diversity is the objective, then the microbes are collected from the wildest place one can find. The owner of this farm, Dennis Dierks, has wilderness at his doorstep, and so collected his microbes from the woods behind Carandang’s stage. Where there is no forest, the objective is still to find the place with greatest diversity. This could be even on the farm itself—a wild area behind the compost pile, or a healthy hedgerow. In fact, the closer to the farm, the better, as the most beneficial microbes are those naturally adapted to the ecosystem.
As the microbes are attracted and arrive to eat the carbohydrates, they go from invisible to visible, but just barely. Forest microbes are collected using cooked white rice, and success is marked by the appearance, after a few days, of mold. Lacto bacilli are heralded by the curdling of milk, other microbes simply by a sour smell to the liquid they’re in. Add some sugar, though, and the transformation is mind-blowing.
Last year, I saw Dierks’ brews as they came to life in his potting shed. They weren’t pretty, mostly soupy brown liquids in jugs and buckets, but the life inside them was astonishing. He went to give me a smell of one, labeled “Root Brew,” only to find the bottle cap had been sealed on by liquid seeping out from inside. He wrenched the plastic bottle between his hands, pulled, and bang! The cap popped off and liquid exploded all over the shed.
We stood there for a moment, our bare arms and faces and shirts brown and wet, Dennis holding what had become a sated volcano, calm but still dribbling out lava. “If this were chemicals we would be totally poisoned right now,” he said, “not to mention out of a lot of money. But that’s the beauty of it. Instead, your skin feels soft. It feels alive. And it’s free. I haven’t been this excited about farming for 25 years.”
Later in the season, several of Dierks’ long-time customers commented that his produce tasted better than in years past, and was keeping for longer. Meanwhile, Diane Matthews, another local farmer who had learned Carandang’s techniques, was using her own microbe brew to fight off the Phytopthera that was decimating her raspberries. “The plants were supposed to die,” she said at the workshop. “I didn’t know what would happen, but I figured I’d try the forest microbes. What happened was the Phytopthera disappeared. I got a crop at Thanksgiving! The berries were small, but their taste was excellent.”
The specific power of Lacto
Carandang explains that one can also home in on specific microbes for targeted results. The most useful is Lacto bacillus. This microorganism is the workhorse of the human digestive system (though luckily it is also found elsewhere). On the farm it’s used for similar tasks of digestion, something Dierks was relieved to hear last winter after the NOP had mandated that all manure be fully broken down before use. He applied his L. bacillus culture to the mound of manure beside his field, and the composting was faster than ever. Similarly, when sprayed on plants, L. bacilli will digest the biomass on the leaves and stems—dust, for instance, or mud—thus making that free food available to its host.
“Lacto” is the only microbe Carandang will mention by name, but it is only one of millions that can be collected and used. His instructions are characteristically simple: walk around the farm, find elements you want to reproduce, and collect the microbes that surround them. You could get the microbes from around a particularly robust tomato plant and spray that on next year’s crop. (These concoctions last for months, even years.) To make a growth promoter, find a beanstalk growing like mad, clip the leaves at the top of vine (where all the growth is happening) and make a brew of the resident microbes. Do it with bamboo, or even kelp, which grows inches each day.
“In the Philippines, we use water lettuce,” Carandang says. “We spray it on the cucumbers and boom! You can do that and be three or five days ahead of the other local farmers. If you’re a market gardener, that can be a big deal.”
After talking for nearly seven hours straight, Carandang ends the workshop because the daylight is starting to fade. The energy in the barn only rises. Despite the chill in the air and the stiff legs it granted us, we are all now bustling about, discussing how we plan—already—to put the technology to work.
Alan Mart does organic landscaping and soil management plans. His first thought is to collect the microbes from willow roots, which suffer no transplant shock, and apply them to other, more fragile specimens that he’s planting.
Patty Salmon is a goat rancher who has been turning her farm organic for years, but has always hit a wall when it comes to feed. With only 8 acres, she can’t possibly grow all the grain and forage for her herd of 100. Carandang explained that his brother, a chicken farmer, ferments his feed and applies Lacto bacillus to it. This causes a pre-digestion that makes a greater percentage of the nutrients available to the chickens, and results in their eating less. Salmon thinks maybe she can extend her reach by doing the same.
Also conferring are Doug Gallagher and Annabelle Lenderink, from Star Route Farms, one of the oldest and most venerated organic farms in the country. Gallagher heard about beneficial microorganisms 25 years ago, and the farm is already using some store-bought varieties to combat lettuce drop and mildew. They’ve had moderate success, though Gallagher admits they continue using them less because of quantifiable effects and more because he believes in the concept. He’s hopeful that will change with microbes collected from the farm’s forested acreage, which have evolved to thrive in that particular piece of land. And if not, well, at least they’re free.
Of course Carandang is swarmed with students and their questions after the talk. While waiting their turns, a few pick up the two clean brown bottles on the larger folding table. They contain Carandang’s own Lacto bacillus culture, made back in the Philippines. He brings them along to demonstrate a finished product, but he also has a few for sale. Frankly, though, for all his charms, he’s a terrible businessman. One workshop student carries a bottle over to him and asks the price.
“It’s ten dollars,” Carandang says, “but you don’t need to buy it. Just make your own. I guarantee it will be better.”
Gil Carandang offers workshops and, for those who cannot attend, detailed booklets on indigenous microorganism cultivation and other innovative technologies. Carandang has also written a book on the topic, Indigenous Microorganisms - Grow your own: Beneficial indigenous microorganisms and bionutrients in natural farming. To order write to: Gil Carandang
Herbana Farms, Km. 59 burol, Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines, email:gil_carandang@hotmail.com or visit: www.herbanafarms.com
|
This is their new link:
This is their new link: herbanafarms.posterous.com :) I've checked herbanafarm.com and it's no longer up.
Worms in my fermented plant extract!
Hi everyone,
Thank you for the knowledge you all have been sharing.
About ten days ago, I bought some ripened bananas, and ripened papayas to make fermented plant extract. I fermented each fruit in separate containers.
The banana has been fermenting for about 10 days now, and started showing sign of mold on the 3rd day and smelled alcoholic. I thought it may be done by then, but I was thinking i should wait up to 10 days, but now when I looked into my fermented banana, I see some lightly off white colored worms! what is it? and is it supposed to be this way?
For the papaya, it has only been fermenting for about 3 days now, and is already showing signs of white mold on top of the fermentation. Yet on the white mold, i see this tiny small rolly polly like insect crawling on the mold.
I live in california in the valley, and the temperature outdoors have been a consistent 90 degrees, with no AC turned on in the house. home temperature is around high 80's..Please please help me get this right!
Thank you very much
reteP
Biofertilizer from Mexico - similar to the above
This is great stuff. Would like to mention also that the COAS team in Mexico are doing highly complimentary work to this: http://www.coas.com.mx as evidenced in a biofertilizer recipe taught to us by Eugenio Gras of COAS involving milk, lactobacilli coming from very fresh manure and other very accessible, everyday ingredients - recipe and links here: http://milkwood.net/2010/09/07/biofertilizer-recipe-1
Coas biofertilizer
This coas biofertizer should frankly be banned as it is currently taught by gras. Call it what it is: methane digestion. It uses methanogenic archeae (not lacto b) from the cow's gut to generate a nitrogen rich digestate AND a huge amount of methane. The problem with coas' "biofertilizer" bioreactor is that they let ALL the methane escape into the atmosphere (they joke that this is the biofertilizer "farting"). This "biofertilizer" farting is no joke though. Methane is 23 times more potent than CO2 over a 100 year life span. Over 20 years it's 70 times more potent. Many climate scientists say we have less than 20 years before major climatic feedback loops will kick in. COAS has been teaching this "biofertilizer"-- read methane digester-- for years throughout Latin America and many of the producers make a lot of "biofertilizer" and a lot of fugitive methane. We give CAFO feed lots a hard time for their methane production and then give a free pass to a "sustainable" biofertilizer? Call biofertilizer what it is: methane digestion. Stop wrapping it in a different name so we can use the acumulated science on methane digestion and get smart about the major green house gas emission problems of the coas biofertilizer. At this point in the climate change progression we can't afford an erroneously named, greenhouse gas emmiting agriculture approach masquerading as "sustainable" or "regenerative."
in the face of a call to ban
in the face of a call to ban this biofertilizer, can I humbly ask : is there available a natural alternative for poor farmers who can't afford expensive artificial chemical fertilizer if biofertilizers are not used? is there another natural alternative that they have easy access to without requiring large capital investment? if the answer to both counts are "no", can I ask who has the right to ban the use of biofertilizer when we can't provide a better alternative for the poor farmers?
Replying to "in the face of
Replying to "in the face of a call to ban"
Fellow Anonymous I do appreciate your concern for poor farmers. However, I think your logic isn't well thought out. You ask
"in the face of a call to ban this biofertilizer, can I humbly ask : is there available a natural alternative for poor farmers who can't afford expensive artificial chemical fertilizer if biofertilizers are not used?"
First off, in my call for a ban on coas' "biofertilizer" below I called for a ban on how it is taught not necessarily the use of the nitrogen rich liquid. COAS's "biofertlizer" is first off not new or unique. It is a biogas or methane digester. The first step is to get away from the Orwellian language and call it what it actually is: a methane digester or biogas digester that produces nitrogen rich waste liquid digestate. Once we do that there is a bunch of credible science already on methane digestion we can use to evaluate whether COAS' presentation of it is sustainable environmentally and financially.
On the above environmental sustainability note, if you again read my post below I do not call for an entire ban on what COAS is doing. I call for a ban on "how" COAS is and has taught their "biofertlizer" technology to both small poor and big wealthy farmers in Latin America for the past 15 years. COAS teaches people to simply let the methane escape into the atmosphere (naming it "farting"). That is an indefensible position from an environmental sustainability perspective period.
Let's look squarely at the problems faced by poor farmers. They are experiencing weather pattern disturbances of climate change now. Drought, floods, unseasonal rain fall patterns screwing with planting cycles. Unlike wealthy farmers, poor farmers do not have the financial buffer to absorb these shocks or move their operations. They rely on the food they grow to eat on the land they farm. Teaching them a technique that will produce a known green house gas and contribute to increasingly severe future climatic weather disturbances in order to get cheap soluble nitrogen now is frankly a cruel trick.
COAS should simply call their "biofertilier" reactor a methane digester, focus on the methane as a valuable energy product TO BE CAPTURED and the waste ammonium (NH4) rich digestate as a soluble plant fertilizer. Farmers could get two products: biogas and nitrogen rich fertilizer. Furthermore, COAS should go back to all the farmers they taught and teach them how to redesign their reactors to capture the methane.
There are many people teaching biogas production in this way. Its not a new or unique technique pioneered by COAS. Calling this a special and unique "biofertilizer" technique keeps everyone from seeing this through clear scientific eyes. Look up the anaerobic microbiological processes involved in methane digestion. Methane (CH4) is produced along with a liquid waste byproduct rich in ammonium (NH4) between 40-55% and smaller amounts of phosphorus and potassium depending On the input materials going into the digester.
This nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are in (water H2O) soluble forms in the liquid, readily taken up by the plants. From a plant perspective, it doesn't label the NH4 as "natural" vs "artificial" because it came from a home made digester vs a synthetic fertilizer salesman. NH4 is NH4. Doesn't matter where it came from its the same molecule.
So now we can ask questions about whether using lots of soluble nitrogen (which NH4 is) on farm fields is good. The regenerative agriculture critiques we make about "chemical fertilizer company" nitrogen run-off from farm fields or volatilized gaseous nitrous oxide (N2O) from nitrogen fertilized wet fields applies directly to how we use BOTH "artificial" synthetic nitrogen fertilizer OR "natural" nitrogen rich biofertilizer. The plants and the soil microbes don't follow our value judgments. They work with chemistry. The methane digester industry is putting forward the waste liquid as a valuable farm fertilizer. This stuff will have to come under the same scrutiny as the "artificial" soluble nitrogen fertilizer produced by Dow.
Lastly, fellow Anonymous, you make a point of positioning biofertilizer as the only affordable alternative fertilizer for poor farmers. You've posted on the Rodale website. Rodale's been in the business of figuring out affordable home made farmer fertility techniques for the last 6 decades. Look at Jeff Moyer's no-till work, the Rodale decadal compost trials, the recent hiring of Elaine Ingham, heck, look at the article above in which we're both posting comments. Plently here alone at the Rodale website. If you don't like Rodale's slant, then head over to Acres to check out the Albreact mineralized Ideal Soil approach. Or go to ATTRA's website hybridizing the two. There are lots of affordable ways for poor farmers to create their own fertilizers. And whether its Rodale or the Albreact approach they talk about NON-SOLUBLE (organic in terms of chemistry) nutrients going into the soil as a way to reduce or avoid Nitrogen run off and nitrous oxide gas volatilizing.
I think there is a strong and important place for methane generation and nitrogen rich liquid digestate in farms. But we may be using a lot less of the soluble nitrogen digestate directly on the fields (reducing run off and N2O). I don't think teaching farmers the current "biofertlizer" approach is the way to go. Capture the methane! Teach it as a biogas system with a nitrogen rich liquid byproduct.
Earthworms love BIM!
I just wanted to let you know that I followed your instructions on beneficial microorganisms. I live in a place where the soil is clay.
I have been doing no till gardening and dipping the newspapers I use
with lacto BIM, and guess what, the earth worms love it!!! I have never seen so many earthworms in my garden.
I am also doing straw bale gardening for the first time, and used BIM on the straw bales... the earthworms are there too! Thanks for putting this on line for all to learn from.
growing lactobacilli
Is it the lactobacillus acidophilus which is beneficial?Perhaps some other lactobacilli which can be obtained from merely allowing milk to spoil?Thanks in advance.
Efective micro0rganism
hello.
How to make effective micro organism? is it the same technique you used
??
Beneficial micro-organisms 2
can you also send me a copy on how to make a beneficial micro-organisms to?
Willow roots do not benefit
Willow roots do not benefit from microbes.... They produce a natural rooting hormone.... However the rest of the science involved is correct......
small backyard gardening
How would you apply these ideas to growing food in backyard pots?
Beneficial micro-organisms
can you please send me the recipe to make the beneficial micro-organisms? I live here in the Philippines and want to manage a farm the cheapest way possible.Thank you.
bio-organic fertilizer
Mr. Gil Carandang is brilliant in making this technology understandable in layman's terms. I am also a farmer here in the Philippines and live in a small compact farm. With little input one can live well in a small farm. Similar technology are very much online now. Look into Likasaka with their own recipe for fermented juices and fertilizers. It is free. Earthkeepers of Tiaong, Quezon and several farmers published their own concoctions (Agriculture monthly magazine backissues). I have several in my file.
Most important source of reference is the Institute of Molecular Biology, or BIOTECH, University of the Philppines. It is very scientific and practical.
May the elements, wind, rain, sunlight, air and microorganisms conspire and help you with your endeavors.
Alma Gamil
incorrect link
the above link to Herbana Farms above is incorrect as ther is no "s" in their URL .. the correct link is www.herbanafarm.com
Fixed
Thanks Wayne. The link has been update.
Tim
Post new comment